Market Research vs. Gut Instinct:
Which one should guide your rebrand?
It’s a historic dilemma. You’re poised to lead your company through a much-needed rebrand. Your stakeholders have shared their opinions and insights. Your agency has delivered its assessment and market trends. You have a strong sense of where to take things, but you hesitate to pull the trigger because, without market research, there’s a risk that you’ve presumed too much. Does your team truly know your customers’ perceptions of you, your offerings, and your competitors? Do you trust your gut and forge ahead? Or do you invest significant time, budget, and bandwidth to conduct primary research?
Decision time
There are obviously two camps here: Those who swear by market research and those who question its return on investment. Supporters of market research will defend its value as a generator of actionable insights. They see research as the only way to truly validate strategic directives, and as the only insurance policy against well-intended, but potentially disastrous, brand positioning and marketing mistakes.
Opponents of market research, on the other hand, will cite its limitations—its retrospective point of view, incomplete answers, potential subjectivity in analysis, and the likelihood that customers don’t know what they want. They’ll also point out that advanced primary research—the kind most likely to yield actionable insights—can add zeros to the budget and months to the timeline.
So you’re left to ponder these pros and cons, complicated by budget and time pressures. Will the promised rewards of research be worth the expended resources? Or will you end up staring at a report that yields conflicting outcomes, negligible preferences, and few actionable insights?
Take a minute. Breathe deep. And move forward without the market research.
Will the promised rewards of research be worth the expended resources? Or will you end up staring at a report that yields conflicting outcomes, negligible preferences, and few actionable insights?
No silver bullet
Not what you expected to hear from your agency? Granted, this isn’t advice we give to every client, every time. But in many instances, you can forgo research and lean on the market knowledge and experience already within your organization. There may be gaps, and there may be doubts, but you aren’t navigating foreign territory without a compass. You know your business and customer better than anyone. So in many cases, we believe gut is good enough.
Over 20 years in branding, we’ve come to realize that market research is an acquired taste. But it’s a taste that we’ve come to appreciate. We recognize that there are scenarios where research is critically needed, and when foregoing it can lead to some nasty heartburn.
But market research is no silver bullet. It’s a directional tool with real constraints. It often delivers incomplete or ambiguous signals rather than clear answers, leaving room for interpretation and bias. Strong ideas can be diluted or misread through the lens of respondent feedback, and even rigorous analysis is still subject to scrutiny and second-guessing. Ultimately, you may find yourself pushing for changes to the brand strategy, the creative, or both—if only to justify the research spend.
Proceed with collaboration
If you decide to move forward without market research, lean on your team’s collective experience. Involve stakeholders who best represent the voice of the customer. Collaborate with your leadership and agency to build true consensus around a strategy, a campaign, or a brand that can be rallied around. Have your agency document the thinking in detail. Set KPIs. Launch. Track. Re-evaluate.
Sign up for more Traina news, insights and updates.
By signing up to receive emails from Traina, you agree to our Privacy Policy. We treat your info responsibly. Unsubscribe anytime.
But…
Supporting a client’s carefully considered decision to bypass primary research in favor of taking action is something we don’t take lightly. There’s a lot at stake. If, in the end, you see the business results you were striving for, then research won’t be missed. But if the game plan turns out to be faulty, that “no-to-research” decision may be criticized.
For some, acting on initial plans and convictions will thwart any feelings of regret in hindsight, and perceived missteps will yield only learning for the future.
For others, the business risk of proceeding without research will feel too great. And the potential scrutiny will outweigh any thought of forgoing research in the first place. If that’s your camp…
Then let’s go get some data.