Field guide to identifying a brand name
The search for that elusive, ideal name begins

Whether you’re a novice or an expert, the search for an ideal brand name is often an adventure through uncharted territories. In our experience, the “perfect” name is a mostly mythological creature or has already been tagged several times over. The good news is that there are innumerable amazing choices just waiting to be discovered in the wild. All you need is an open mind, self-confidence as a name evaluator, and a few rules of the road.
If you’re about to embark on evaluating names for your brand or its products, keep this guide close and enjoy the journey.
Common sightings: what to anticipate
Let’s get you squared away on what you’re likely to experience as name candidates are presented as solutions for your endeavor.
First, the naming kingdom is vast, representing innumerable species, classes and families of words. Reviewing all the options can feel overwhelming. Anticipate some mental overload and don’t pressure yourself to make a clear-cut decision on initial review.
Also expect that your initial encounter with a name candidate may feel uncomfortable. Can you imagine how decision makers felt when presented with Google, Virgin or WD-40 as naming options? Just remember, the unfamiliar often feels strange before it becomes iconic.
Finally, naming is mostly a creative endeavor. Creativity is subjective—so expect what resonates with you isn’t what resonates with everyone else. Lean on your creative agency to facilitate differences in opinion, and resist the need to pull in even more voices to solve the debates (more on that below).
Names with impact carry a powerful message, touch an emotional chord, or deliver a unique level of unexpectedness—but rarely all three simultaneously.”
Field notes: rules of the road
With expectations set, let’s turn our attention to some proven principles for identifying a name that will soon feel native to your brand.
- A literal, descriptive name can provide unwanted camouflage. In a globalized economy saturated in brands, highly distinctive names create stronger territorial claims than straightforward, descriptive ones. A distinctive name stands out in the landscape, while descriptive ones often blend into the background—making them harder to protect legally. It didn’t take Brad’s Drink long to rename as Pepsi-Cola.
- Great names often start as empty vessels. The most future-proofed names begin as blank canvases ready to absorb meaning. Like unmarked territory, they provide space to build associations over time rather than arriving pre-loaded with limiting connotations. This adaptability accommodates growth and the natural evolution of your company and offerings.
- A name can’t do everything, but it should do one thing well. It’s natural to want a name to carry too much weight, but that burden is often counter-productive. Names with impact carry a powerful message, touch an emotional chord, or deliver a unique level of unexpectedness—but rarely all three simultaneously.
- Don’t expect the perfect name to emerge in jaw-dropping fashion. Transcendental experiences are rare in naming—most successful names grow into their power over time rather than arriving with immediate, overwhelming force. Just ask Häagen-Dazs.
- Testing (market research) doesn’t necessarily help you find your way in the wilderness. In fact, testing often brings less clarity. Asking external audiences what they think about names often leads to conflicting opinions, subjective observations and a blurry picture. If you must test, don’t ask what others like—people will over-index on names that feel familiar and literal—but test recall and whether names trigger any unintended cultural missteps or problematic connotations that your team might have overlooked.
Navigating name selection: tips for your team
You’re likely not on this journey alone. Identifying remarkable names is typically a group decision—and finding consensus requires combining careful observation with some specialized techniques. Here’s what we’ve found works best.
Keep your evaluation team small (4-8 people), leadership-centric (authority to make decisions on behalf of the company) and cross-functional. In larger organizations, tiered decision-making is an unavoidable reality. In that case, the core team should shepherd the names all the way through to the final decider.
Your team should have a punch list of predetermined criteria as to what would make a great name (ala the name should connote speed, should not exceed two words, etc.). This is typically part of the upfront naming brief process your creative agency will have taken you through.
As short-listing of name candidates begins, if your team…
- Disagrees on names, refer back to the established criteria.
- Clashes on the criteria or the criteria has shifted, get realigned first, then return to the evaluation process. (Also an opportunity to reduce the criteria, really focusing on what’s most important.)
- Agrees on the criteria, but remains at odds over the best names, implement a weighted scorecard to judge each candidate in more granular fashion based on each criteria point (using a 1-10 scale or similar).
- Begins to doubt their ability to make a decision, then take a pause. Come back to the names in a few days. Avoid, at all costs, the temptation to “open it up to a vote” via a company-wide poll. More voices do not beget more insights.
And lean on your creative agency to guide the process. They bring both experience and the ability to be a neutral arbitrator. Successful name selection means spotting more than one potential name (aim for 3-5) to take through the legal vetting process.
Sign up for more Traina news, insights and updates.
By signing up to receive emails from Traina, you agree to our Privacy Policy. We treat your info responsibly. Unsubscribe anytime.
Conservation notes: protection and implementation
Great names also fulfill some key functional requirements. Reference the following as your expedition nears its conclusion.
- Legal protection requires specialists
Determining the trademarking potential of your preferred naming candidates is critical. It’s also complex terrain requiring expert navigation. Anticipate investing (time and budget) in this part of the process to get it right. And plan to identify 3-5 preferred name choices—not just a single candidate—to take through the legal process. Preliminary trademark screenings and desktop research by your creative agency are a helpful first step, but findings then must be validated by legal professionals who understand the nuanced landscape. - Digital environments have evolved
An exact match domain name (ie “name.com”) is not mandatory for success. Today’s digital ecosystem offers multiple paths to discovery, and consumers have adapted to finding brands through various channels. Alternative domains, social handles, and creative URL solutions can work effectively when the core name is strong. - A multi-cultural world awaits
Your brand name can convey a strong message, but it can also express the wrong idea—in other languages. The solution here is a linguistics screening to verify a name’s pronounceability, meaning and cultural appropriateness with non-native audiences. Include this step in your process to avoid the lamentable selection of a regrettable name.
An exact match domain name is not mandatory for success. Today’s digital ecosystem offers multiple paths to discovery.”
Found hiding in plain sight
When you know how to look, every season is naming season. The path to discovery can sometimes feel steep, but an entire world of fascinating name possibilities are out there, just waiting to be noticed.
This field guide was developed for brand explorers seeking to identify remarkable names in their natural habitat. Remember that the most successful names often become familiar over time, growing into their environments rather than dominating them immediately. Trust your instincts, but follow these field-tested principles for the best results. For more naming best practices, visit www.wearetraina.com/insights